House pushes for CE curriculum review
NAP soon to own its building
The
House of Representatives has adopted House Resolution No. 1722 urging President
Rodrigo Duterte to issue a proclamation which would transfer the ownership and
administration of the Intendencia Building in Intramuros, Manila to the
National Archives of the Philippines (NAP).
The
signing of such presidential proclamation would allow the NAP, the repository
of documentary records of Filipino culture, history and governance, to have a
place of its own.
The
NAP has been housed at the Intendencia Building for the past 18 years but it
does not own the edifice.
The
resolution states that the NAP is the only national archive in Southeast Asia
that does not have a place of its own. This leaves about 18.8 million pages of
Philippine cultural treasure in the NAP’s possession in danger of total decay
and damage.
The NAP was created under Republic Act No.
9470, which mandates the State to pursue, conserve and promote Filipino
cultural heritage and resources including the documentary records of Filipino
culture, history and governance. It is also primary responsible for the
strengthening of existing system of management and administration of government
archival records and ensure the accessibility of public records that are
relevant to the promotion and preservation of Philippine cultural heritage.
During the past administrations, the
government recognized the NAP’s stay at the Intendencia Building. The proofs of
recognition are stated in several Letters of Instruction (LOIs) and Memoranda,
directing the restoration of the building and the approval of NAP’s request to
acquire and use the Intendencia Building.
However,
the Intramuros Administration (IA) claimed authority over the Intendencia
Building in spite of several memoranda between the NAP and IA which granted
authority to the NAP as the building’s legal custodian and allowed the joint
undertaking for the restoration and reconstruction of the structure.
The
government even allocated P12 million for NAP’s restoration of Intendencia
Building under the 2013 General Appropriations Act. The reconstruction was
completed in 2014 with the assistance of the IA.
To
completely restore and reconstruct the building, the government allocated an
additional P479 million through the NAP in 2015, but the Department of Budget
and Management (DBM) withheld the release of the funds due to conflicting
claims of ownership of the Intendencia Building by the NAP and IA.
The
Office of the Chief Legal Counsel (OCPLC) issued a legal opinion on Sept. 6,
2016 favoring the IA as the building owner. But the OCPLC retracted its legal
opinion after the NAP submitted a Motion for Reconsideration.
The
NAP has in its possession the largest collection in the country of authentic
and priceless records dating back to the Spanish Colonial Period, which are
critical to the Philippines’ Hispano-American heritage. These were declared as
National Cultural Treasure in 2015.
The
resolution states that due to the exigency of the matter and in view of
national interest and the importance of preserving the voluminous collections
of archival records relating to Philippine history and heritage, it is deemed
appropriate that the NAP be provided with a permanent and secure office space.
(JA Menorca)
#onehouseforchange
NEWS
Releas
18
March 2018
House pushes for CE curriculum review
The
House of Representatives has adopted House Resolution 1767, urging the
Commission on Higher Education (CHED) to conduct the mandatory review of the
Civil Engineering curriculum to integrate relevant academic subjects on
earthquake design safety which will help ensure the structural integrity of
Philippine building and civil works.
The
resolution also directs the House committee on higher and technical education
to conduct an inquiry into the appropriateness and relevance of the Civil
Engineering curriculum in offering a long-term response to the threats of
earthquake and seismic magnitudes greater than intensity 7 on the Richter
scale.
The
resolution acknowledged the spate of recent strong earthquakes that hit many
parts of the world in series, which include Haiti, New Zealand, Japan and areas
within the Pacific Ring of fire, raising the fear of a looming earthquake far
beyond intensity 7.
The
current factor of safety for building designs is pegged to withstand a 7.2
magnitude only.
The
resolution states that relevant engineering interventions should now be put in
place to ensure the structural integrity of existing structures to enable them
to withstand strong earthquakes.
The
strict compliance and integration of the National Structural Code of the
Philippines 2010 (NSCP), and the National Building Code of the Philippines
(NBCP) in the Civil Engineering curriculum should be enforced, the resolution
further states.
The
Philippine Regulatory Commission (PRC) should include Earthquake Engineering
Design as a topic in the Civil Engineering Licensure Examination, it states.
The
preferential importance should be given to the integration of earthquake
engineering design in the Civil Engineering curriculum as a major course and
not merely as an elective.
The
aptitude of Civil Engineering graduates in earthquake engineering design must
be duly measured through the licensure examination conducted for engineering
professionals by the PRC to ensure that the quality of Filipino Civil Engineers
and the integrity of the buildings and structures they design and build are
beyond reproach, the resolution states. (E. Galvez)
#onehouseforchange
Rep Siao pushes CHEd to upgrade
higher education finance
Facebook:
/congressmansiao Twitter: @freddiesiao 0917-729-2437
As
CHED embarks on fully implementing the free college education in SUCs law, I
now ask CHED OIC Prospero de Vera and his fellow Commissioners, to consider and
study:
(1) the establishment of a higher education
version of the current DepEd senior high school voucher system; and
(2) create a CHED Learner Information System
that would dovetail with the LIS of DepEd;
(3) the issuance of Education Bonds to
finance the multi-year infrastructure and service facilities upgrading of the
SUCs, especially those with very old and obsolete structures.
Electronic
Student Vouchers
The
CHED knows the SUCs have limited admission capacity. SUCs cannot accept all
students who apply for slots because there are a finite slots, so to still be
able to give other Filipino youths access to free or at least significantly
state-subsidized education, a higher education voucher system like that of the
DepEd for SHS is the best option we have so far.
We
could use the same voucher system and processes the DepEd uses or we can build
a similar or even better system which colleges and universities can have access
to.
There
are already precedents for a voucher system for higher education: the GASTPE
and the ESC. ESC is Education Service Contracting system and the GASTPE is the
Government Assistance to Private Education. But these are old systems which
would need updating, so CHED must update, upgrade, or overhaul as needed. I
suppose a law is needed to make this happen, so I expect CHED to send to us a
draft bill.
LIS,
LRN
The
CHED LIS is needed now that we have the PQF or Philippine Qualifications
Framework. Extending the DepEd LIS to the CHED and TESDA is logical progression
given that the PQF is in place. That LIS is the database we need for the PQF.
A
key element of the DepEd LIS is the LRN or learner reference number, which is
simply put, the student number of every student in the basic education system.
I believe those students should carry that same reference number when they move
on to technical schools, colleges, and universities. That LRN can be attached
to the student number the tertiary schools give to their students. This way,
the CHED LIS can keep track of all students. This is needed for the PQF.
The
challenge now to the CHED is to extend that LIS and the LRNs to the higher
education system. I assume this will need a budget, so I expect CHED to submit
a multi-year budget for this. The CHED can also seek foreign grants for it, to
lessen the load on the future years’ GAA.
Education
Bonds
Lastly,
many of our SUCs have very old buildings and other facilities. The need is so
great but most budget requests from SUCs for capital outlays are not included
in the GAA because the GAA cannot support those requests. The appropriate
solution is the issuance of Education Bonds.
This
idea is not new, but I am reiterating it because it has become absolutely
necessary. The SUCs cannot be left behind while the Duterte administration
implements its Build, Build, Build infrastructure program.
We
must modernize the facilities of our SUCs so that we can generate even deeper
economic development, particularly in the countryside.
On
the Education Bonds, the CHED must work with the Department of Finance, which
is in-charge of all matters on the issuance of government bonds. This
coordination should happen soon. I suggest the convening of a SUCS Capital
Outlays Summit where we can work on the major details of the proposal to be
submitted to Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez. (END)
News
Release
19
March 2018
House panel OKs impeachment vs.
Sereno
VOTING
33-1, the House Committee on Justice today approved its 45-page committee
report finding probable cause to impeach Supreme Court Chief Justice Ma.
Lourdes Sereno.
The
committee likewise approved the accompanying 56-page Articles of Impeachment,
detailing the charges against her that would be elevated to the Senate for
trial.
The
lone dissenter is Quezon City Rep. Christopher Belmonte.
“We
have made history here in defining the impeachment process in the HOR (House of
Representatives),” said committee chair, Rep. Reynaldo Umali.
Umali
said the six articles of impeachment that the committee has prepared “will be
the foundation in prosecuting this impeachment case before the Senate, as an
impeachment court.”
The
first article of impeachment charges Sereno for culpable violation of the
constitution and betrayal of public trust for non-filing and non-disclosure of
her Sworn Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth.
Sereno,
according to the committee, misled the Judicial and Bar Council in 2010 when
she claimed it is not possible to retrieve her SALNs from 1996 to 2006. She is
also accused of failing to declare in her
11 SALN 2.24 hectares of land in Mariveles, Bataan, registered under her
and her husband’s name, worth around P44 million.
Likewise,
the panel said Sereno failed to declare in her 2006 and 2009 SALNs the amount
of P13.8 million which is part of the more than P32 million she earned from the
PIATCO cases. Moreover, the committee said Sereno failed to file her SALN 17
times: for 1987 to 1997, for 1999 to 2001, and 2003 to 2005.
The
committee also charged Sereno for tax fraud.
In
the second article, Sereno was charged for corruption and betrayal of public
trust for misusing a total of P18 million in public funds in the purchase of a
brand-new Toyota Land Cruiser, hiring of IT consultant for a fee of over P11
million, and using Shangrila Boracay for the meeting of ASEAN chief justices.
Under
the third article, Sereno was accused of arrogating the collegial power of the
Supreme Court en banc by issuing resolutions and order without the approval of
the body, or contrary to what was agreed by the en banc.
In
the fourth article, Sereno was charged for deliberately and maliciously abusing
her position as Chief Justice and ex officio chairperson of the Judicial and
Bar Council through efforts to exclude then Solicitor General Francis Jardeleza
from the short list of nominees to the vacant SC post, among others.
The
fifth article accuses Sereno of deliberately undermining and violating the
principle of separation of powers among the three branches of government when,
among others, she interfered in the investigation of the House on the misuse of
tobacco excise tax funds by the Ilocos Norte government by asking Court of
Appeals justices to challenge the House order by elevating the issue before the
SC.
Lastly,
the panel charged Sereno for betrayal of public trust by wilfully and
deliberately failing to comply with her oath of office and by tyrannical abuse
of discretionary power.
Umali
also noted that based on the expert opinion of Dr. Geraldine Tria, who reviewed
Sereno’s psychiatric evaluation, that
she displayed the following 5 out of 9 symptoms of mental disturbance:
interpersonally exploitative; preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success,
power and brilliance; lacks empathy; has sense of entitlement, and a grandiose
sense of self-importance.
Umali
noted that the judiciary is divided, noting the unprecedented move of the SC en
banc to force Sereno to go on an indefinite leave.
“The
situation of our Supreme Court today and the judiciary is turning from bad to
worse,” Umali said, pointing out that several organizations within the
judiciary have joined the demand for Sereno’s resignation.
“This
clearly shows the divided judiciary that would only escalate if the leadership
in the third branch of government continues to be dysfunctional,” Umali said.
The
approved committee report and the accompanying Articles of Impeachment will be
sent to the Committee on Rules which will then decide, within 10 session days,
when to calendar the matter for plenary deliberation.
Once
in the matter is in the plenary, the House has 60 session days to finally vote
on whether or not to send Sereno’s impeachment to the Senate for trial. ####
#onehouseforchange
News
Release
19
March 2018
House redefines kids’ TV council
The
House of Representatives has approved on third and final reading House Bill
7290, which seeks to amend the composition of the Advisory Committee of the
National Council for Children’s Television to ensure the NCCT gets only proper
and accurate advice from concerned agencies in the formulation of national
policies pertaining to children’s television programs and broadcasts.
All
228 House Members present during the voting supported the passage of the bill.
The
bill seeks to amend Section 6 of Republic Act No. 8370, also known as the
“Children’s Television Act of 1997”, so that there shall be created an Advisory
Committee whose function is to assist the NCCT in crafting national policies
pertaining to children’s broadcast programs and in monitoring their
implementation.
The
members of the Advisory Committee shall be the Executive Director of the
Council for the Welfare of Children; Head of the National Commission for
Culture and the Arts (NCCA) Committee on Cultural Education and Information;
President of the Kapisanan ng mga Brodkaster sa Pilipinas; President or
Executive Director of the Philippine Association of National Advertisers;
Director-General of the Philippine Information Agency; Chairman of the Movie
and Television Review and Classification Board; a representative from the
National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) Regulation Branch; and a representative
from the National Youth Commission.
The
present members of the Advisory Committee as provided by RA 8370 are the
Executive Director of the Council for the Welfare of Children; Chairman or
Executive Director of the National Commission for Culture and the Arts;
President of the Kapisanan ng mga Brodkaster sa Pilipinas; President or
Executive Director of the Philippine Association of National Advertisers; Press
Undersecretary/Officer-In- Charge of the Philippine Information Agency;
Chairman of the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board; and a
representative from the National Telecommunications Commission.
The
House committee said the important role of the Advisory Committee is to assist
the NCCT in guaranteeing that quality television programs are offered to
Filipino children for their empowerment and holistic development. the committee
further said that various studies and researches reflect the negative effects
of unpleasant TV programs on children such that they could not discriminate between
what they see and what is real: violence and aggressive behaviour; sexuality;
academic performance; body, concept and self-image; nutrition, dieting and
obesity; and substance use and abuse patterns. (WBundang)
#onehouseforchange
PRESS
STATEMENT CONG. LITO ATIENZA (MARCH 19, 2018)
REF.
TO: ERIC CHAM 09178323299
BUHAY Partylist Representative and
Senior Deputy Minority Leader Lito Atienza welcomed President Rodrigo Duterte’s
stand against the passage of the Divorce Law.
“We
welcome and fully appreciate President Duterte’s stand against the divorce law.
The President has saved the Filipino family with his strong position against
divorce, which has been passed on second reading in the Lower House. We strongly agree with the President that
divorce would be very detrimental to mothers and children,” Atienza said in
reaction to the statement of Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque that the
President is against the proposed Divorce Law.
Atienza
had earlier expressed his strong opposition to House Bill 7303 during plenary
deliberations.
“Through
ayes and nays, I, together with a miniscule number of lawmakers voiced our
opposition to the bill but our collective voices were ultimately drowned out by
the majority of Congressmen for the passage of the bill on second reading,”
Atienza added.
“We
admire the President’s display of strength and character. He did not allow himself to be stampeded by
the mob on this critical issue. His
strong leadership will forever be remembered for saving the Filipino family and
future generations. I am sure that with
his strong position against divorce, this bill will most likely be relegated to
the archives,” Atienza stressed.
NEWS
Release
19
March 2018
Six Charges in Articles of
Impeachment based on strong evidence
The
Articles of Impeachment against Supreme Court Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno,
which were approved today by the House committee on justice, contain six
charges that are backed by strong evidence.
“The
six articles are anchored on strong evidence, documentary, and testimonial that
will stand trial,” said committee chairman Rep. Reynaldo Umali during the
hearing on Monday.
Umali
enjoined committee members to consider the present state of the judiciary,
saying the situation “is turning from bad to worse.”
In
the past week, multiple organizations in the judiciary such as the Philippine
Judges Association (PJA) the Supreme Court Assembly of Lawyer Employees
(SCALE), Philippine Association of Court Employees (PACE), Supreme Court
Employees Association and Sandiganbayan Employees Association expressed their
desire for the Chief Magistrate to step down from office.
“This
clearly shows the divided judiciary that would only escalate if the leadership
in the third branch of government continues to be dysfunctional,” Umali said.
With
a vote of 33-1, the committee approved the committee report and Articles of
Impeachment against Sereno.
The
committee report and Articles of Impeachment shall be submitted to the House
plenary for deliberation and approval. If it earns one-third votes of all the
representatives, the impeachment complaint shall be transmitted to the Senate,
which shall convene as an impeachment court.
“Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno has failed
to live up to the standards imposed by the Constitution and the Supreme Court
upon members of the judiciary. She has, by her own acts, caused the diminution
of public faith in the Judiciary,” the Articles of Impeachment stated.
The
first article charges Sereno of non-filing and non-disclosure of Sworn
Statement of Assets and Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN) constituting the
impeachable grounds of culpable violation of the Constitution and/or betrayal
of public trust.
The
second article charges the Chief Justice of committing corruption and betrayal
of public trust over the misuse of a total amount of ₱18 million of public
funds.
This
covers the chief magistrate’s procurement and purchase of a Toyota Land Cruiser
worth over P5 million, violation of the procurement law, causing the hiring and
engagement of a costly IT consultant, and misuse of roughly P3 million of
government funds in the selection of Shangri-La Boracay for the 3rd ASEAN Chief
Justices Meeting and subsequent arrangement for a room upgrade.
Umali
said this manifested Sereno’s “grandiose sense of self-importance.”
The
third article charges Sereno of committing culpable violation of the
Constitution, betrayal of public trust and/or other high crimes when she
arrogated unto herself the powers reposed upon the Supreme Court en banc as a
collegial, deliberative and consultative body.
This
pertains to Sereno issuing and causing to be issued resolutions and orders
without the approval of, or contrary to what was agreed upon by the en banc,
through acts of misrepresentation and manipulation, showing a pattern of
deception.
The
fourth article alleges Sereno committed culpable violation of the Constitution,
betrayal of public trust and/or other high crimes when she abused her position
as the Chief Justice and ex-officio chairperson of the Judicial and Bar Council
(JBC).
The
fifth article charges her with culpable violation of the Constitution and
betrayal of public trust by undermining and violating the principles of
separation of powers among the three branches of government.
Specifically,
Sereno is alleged to have interfered with the House probe on the misuse of
tobacco funds in Ilocos Norte by issuing a joint statement asking the House to
reconsider its show cause order against three SC associate justices, as well as
directing the justices to question any order issued by the House. It further
notes that Sereno undermined and disrespected the impeachment proceedings
against her.
The
sixth and last article charges the Chief Justice with betrayal of public trust
for failing to comply with her oath of office by tyrannical abuse of
discretionary power.
Among
the committee members present during the vote, only Rep. Jose Christopher
Belmonte voted against.
Deputy
Speakers Gwendolyn Garcia, Sharon Garin, Mylene Garcia-Albano, Frederick Abueg,
Fredenil Castro, Raneo Abu, and Ferdinand Hernandez led the lawmakers in
approving the committee report and the Articles of Impeachment. Reps. Eugene De Vera, Vincent Crisologo,
Deogracias Victor Savellano, Doy Leachon, Henry Oaminal, Vicente Veloso, and
Juan Pablo Bondoc, among others, also voted in favor. (CMB Engracia)
#onehouseforchange
NEWS
Release
19
March 2018
House processed 15 measures per
session day
THE
House of Representatives has processed a total of 2,673 measures or an average
of 15 measures per session day since the 17th Congress opened on July 25, 2016.
In
a press briefing today, Deputy Speaker Raneo Abu said since the House began its
sessions for 2018 last January 15, the
chamber approved on third and final reading a total of 25 bills which include
several measures of national importance.
Among
the approved measures are House Bill No. 690, seeking to strengthen the
security of tenure of workers; HB 6689, seeking to grant full insurance
coverage to all qualified CARP beneficiaries; and HB 6834, seeking to
strengthen the right of people to free expression and to peaceably assemble,
among others.
Abu
gave a report on the accomplishments of the House during the bi-monthly press
briefing. He said lawmakers are expected to pass on third and final reading
three more important bills of national importance before Congress adjourns on
March 23. These are HB 7185, seeking to recognize Foreign Decree of Termination
of Marriage; HB 7303, seeking to institute Absolute Divorce and Dissolution of
Marriage; and HB 7378, seeking to reset the May 14, 2018 synchronized Barangay
and Sangguniang Kabataan Elections to the second Monday of October 2018.
So
far, the House has approved 653 measures, 60 of which are already enacted into
law, including 22 measures of national importance. The House also approved 392
measures on third and final reading; 10 measures on second reading; and adopted
144 resolutions and reports on motu proprio inquiry.
Meanwhile,
Rep. Johnny Pimentel, chairman of the Committee on Good Government and Public
Accountability, reported that his committee has been actively investigating
several issues of alleged irregularities in the government.
These
controversies include the P3.5-billion Dengvaxia program, the P9.3-billion
project for barangay health stations, the alleged misuse of Philhealth funds
for senior citizens, the P294-million share of the Ilocos Norte provincial
government from tobacco taxes, and the questionable land deal between the Tagum
Agricultural Development Co., Inc. (Tadeco) and the Bureau of Corrections
(BuCor), which is allegedly grossly disadvantageous to the government.
Rep.
Wilter Wee Palma II, chairman of the subcommittee on the draft BBL, said the
Committees on Local Government and Muslim Affairs as well as the Special Committee on Peace, Reconciliation
and Unity have already completed 18 committee meetings and held 11 public
hearings in Cotabato City; Midsayap in North Cotabato; Davao City; Sulu;
Basilan; Tawi-Tawi; Zamboanga City; Buluan in Maguindanao; Koronadal City;
Tubod in Lanao del Norte; and Marawi City.
He
said the panels are already in the final stage of finalizing the substitute
bill which will amend the creation of the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region. It will
be ready for plenary approval before the end of May.
Lastly,
House Justice Committee Chairman Reynaldo Umali reported that the plenary is
now ready to approve the committee report which found probable cause to impeach
Supreme Court Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno and its accompanying Articles
of Impeachment. Both were approved by the justice committee on Monday by a vote
of 33-1.
He
said that the plenary will finally vote on the impeachment case when Congress
resumes after the Lenten break. (JA Menorca)
#onehouseforchange
Photo
Release
20
March 2018
SUBPOENA FOR IMEE, ET AL--The
House committee on good government and public accountability chaired by Rep.
Johnny Pimentel on Monday approved the issuance of a subpoena ad testificandum
for Ilocos Norte Governor Imee Marcos and six officials of the Provincial
Government of Ilocos Norte (PGIN) to show up in its next hearing slated on May
21, 2018. The hearing is based on House Resolution 1126, directing the
committee to conduct an inquiry, in aid of legislation, on the utilization of
the tobacco excise tax and determine the tangible benefits acquired by tobacco
farmers in Ilocos Norte. It was filed by Reps.
Carlos Isagani Zarate, Emmi de Jesus, Antonio Tinio, Arlene Brosas,
France Castro and Sarah Jane Elago of the Makabayan bloc. (P. Camero/E.
Galvez/W. Bundang)
#onehouseforchange
Office of Rep. Arthur C. Yap
3rd District of Bohol
Tel No. 9315426
March 20, 2018
3rd District of Bohol
Tel No. 9315426
March 20, 2018
Email : kathyrin425@gmail.com
House Committee on Trade tackles bill Further Liberalizing Retail Sector
"We must strike down restrictive laws which impede foreign investments.
The Philippines allowed foreigners to engage in retail trade in the year 2000
and yet, the Philippines is lagging behind retail trade investments in ASEAN
consistently in the last 17 years. Clearly, the law's intention of inviting
retail trade investors, creating jobs and making goods more price and quality
competitive has not been realized," explained by House Commitee Chairman
of Economic Affairs Rep. Arthur C. Yap of the 3rd District of Bohol
in his sponsorship speech of House Bill 4595 during the initial deliberation of
the bill by the House Committee on Trade and Industry.
Said measure primarily seeks to amend restrictive provisions of
The Retail Trade Liberalization Act of 2000 (Republic Act No. 8762) and
eliminating the capital and equity requirement of foreign investors who are
willing to engage in the retail business in the Philippines.
R.A. 8762 requires a paid-up capital of at least USD2.5 million
and a minimum investment of USD830,000 per store for it to be 100%
foreign owned. In the case of fully owned companies specialized in high end or
luxury goods, the minimum paid-up capital is USD250,000 per store.
Additionally, the law sets out other conditions to be met by foreign investors regarding
divestiture requirements, the minimum net worth and number of branches of the
parent corporation, a proven 5 year track record in retailing and the existence
of reciprocity agreements with the country where the corporation is from,
allowing the entry of Filipino retailers.
"Innovation and technology is disrupting the economy. We must invite
companies that have something new to offer, that are imaginative and out of the
box in product offerings to come and set up shop in the Philippines. This will
make the Philippines more attractive to tourists and offer Philippine consumers
better priced quality goods," according to Yap.
"It must tell us something that in this morning's hearing, the DTI,
BOI and the PCC, together with the joint foreign chambers are all on the same
page stating that Philippine retail laws are too restrictive and impede the
growth of the economy, and left unchanged, work against the interests of
millions of Philippine consumers," Yap added.
DTI Undersectary Ruth Castelo said that the department supports
the intent of the bill to improve the country’s investment climate by further
easing restrictions that hinder growth of foreign investments, specifically
inflows in the retail trade industry. However, DTI suggests that instead of
totally removing the existing minimum paid-up capital of US$2,500,000.00, the
minimum paid up capital requirement should just be lowered to US $200,000.00
“While we (DTI) want to encourage foreign investments in the
retail industry, there is also a need to protect our domestic retail sector.
Unlike large local retails that have the capacity to withstand competition from
foreign companies, small domestic retailers may find it difficult to compete in
a fully liberalized market,” stated Castelo.
DTI also suggested that the proposed bill consider the rise of the
use of internet as a newfound avenue for retailing and include in its
contemplation the growth and promotion of online retail trade.
Laban Consumer Inc., represented by Atty. Vic Torino Dimagiba,
also supports further liberalization of retail trade and reasoned that no
wholly owned Filipino retailers is prejudiced by the bill. “According to Forbes
magazine recent data, there are 12 Filipino families that own at least
one-fifth of the country’s wealth. Most of these Filipino retailers core
businesses are in the retail industry. Except for 7-11, most foreign retailers
that invested in the country were bought out of the market by the mega rich
Filipino retailers,” noted Dimagiba.
The hearing was also attended by the members of the Joint Foreign
Chambers, represented by John Forbes of the American Chamber and Julian Payne
of the Canadian Chamber. In their Joint Statement, JFC noted that “the entry of
more foreign retail investors into the sector will create jobs at every stage
of the retail process and, indirectly, in those who service the retail sector.
One new retail job is not just the sales clerk or the cashier that the customer
sees in the store. These are the tip of the retail iceberg, the hidden part of
which includes jobs in advertising, agriculture, construction, design,
logistics, media, telecommunications, and wholesale retail, among others. In
other words, investment in retail cascades through the economy. Retail trade
sector reform will support the more rapid growth of the tourism sector, which is
a major priority of the government. Many foreign tourists travel to shop, for
example to Bangkok, Hong Kong or Singapore. This is especially true of the
growing number of Chinese tourists, who go as far as Paris and London. Famous
brand names and famous department stores operating in major cities attract
foreign shoppers on Orchard Road in Singapore or Nathan Road in Shanghai. Why
not also in Makati, Cebu, Clark, and Davao?”
Chris Nelson, the Chairman of the British Chamber, in his
statement said that British firms have a strong interest in the retail sector.
“The British Chamber, since 2014, has assisted over 1,700 UK companies keen to
establish footprint in the Philippines. The UK is the largest European investor
in the Philippines and our trade relations are strong and growing. The
liberalization of the sector and the resulting elimination of barriers to
market access for foreign retailers will have a positive spillover effect on
the economy, creating more jobs, increasing competition, providing Filipino
consumers with more choices,” Nelson explained.
John Forbes of the American Chamber also observed that, “Our ASEAN
neighbors, by being more welcoming to foreign investment in retailing, did more
to create jobs for their citizens in their countries. Meanwhile, the
Philippines, a country that continues to send large numbers of workers abroad
because they cannot find jobs at home, because of a flawed law failed to
receive similar benefits from foreign investment in retail. We commend the
Duterte Administration for seeking to open the retail sector to more foreign
investment, which potentially will create more jobs for Filipinos at home.”
Photo Release
20 March 2018
WORKING STUDENTS IN FOCUS: The House committee on labor and employment began on Tuesday its
inquiry into the conditions of working students hired on part-time employment.
The inquiry is based on House Resolution 432 filed by committee chairman Rep.
Randolp Ting. The inquiry will determine how the government can protect working
students hired as part-time employees and ensure they are adequately supported
to help them cope with the pressures of balancing work and school. Among those
present during the hearing were Reps. Mark Go, Tom Villarin, France Castro,
Sarah Elago, Ma. Theresa Collantes, Peter Unabia, and Vicente S.E. Veloso.
Undersecretary Jacinto Paras, Assistant Secretary Federico Abuan, Jr. and
Director Monique Tutay of the Department of Labor and Employment.(DOLE), Trade
Union Congress of the Philippines (TUCP) Vice President Arthur Juego, and Regie
Dalisay of the Alliance of Progressive Youth (APY) were among the resource
persons present during the hearing. (W Bundang/G Engay)
#onehouseforchange
posted by brodkaster43 at Martes, Marso 20, 2018
0 comments
